Current:Home > FinanceSome abortion drug restrictions are upheld by an appeals court in a case bound for the Supreme Court -Wealth Empowerment Academy
Some abortion drug restrictions are upheld by an appeals court in a case bound for the Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-18 08:32:59
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — New restrictions on access to a drug used in the most common form of abortion would be imposed under a federal appeals court ruling issued Wednesday, but the Supreme Court will have the final say.
The ruling by three judges on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans overturned part of a lower court ruling that would have revoked the Food and Drug Administration’s decades-old approval of mifepristone. But it left intact part of the ruling that would end the availability of the drug by mail, allow it to be used through only the seventh week of pregnancy rather than the 10th, and require that it be administered in the presence of a physician.
Even those restrictions won’t take effect right away, because the Supreme Court previously intervened to keep the drug available during the legal fight.
“In loosening mifepristone’s safety restrictions, FDA failed to address several important concerns about whether the drug would be safe for the women who use it,” Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod wrote for a panel of three 5th Circuit judges.
She was joined by Judge Cory Wilson. Judge James Ho dissented, arguing to fully uphold a Texas-based federal judge’s April ruling that would revoke the drug’s approval, which the FDA granted in that approval in 2000.
There is no precedent for a U.S. court overturning the approval of a drug that the FDA has deemed safe and effective. While new drug safety issues often emerge after FDA approval, the agency is required to monitor medicines on the market, evaluate emerging issues and take action to protect U.S. patients. Congress delegated that responsibility to the FDA — not the courts— more than a century ago.
But during a May 17 hearing, the 5th Circuit panel pushed back frequently against assertions that U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk’s April 7 ruling was unprecedented and unwarranted.
Kacsmaryk, Ho and Wilson are all appointees of former President Donald Trump. Elrod was appointed to the 5th Circuit by former President George W. Bush. All of the judges have a history of supporting abortion restrictions.
Elrod’s opinion Wednesday said the full revocation of FDA’s approval of the drug was likely barred by legal time limits. Ho argued that the approval violated the 19th century Comstock Act.
The Texas lawsuit was filed by the Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian legal group that was also involved in the Mississippi case that led to the June 2022 Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade and the nationwide right to abortion.
Mifepristone is one of two pills used in medication abortions. The other drug, misoprostol, is also used to treat other medical conditions. Health care providers have said they could switch to misoprostol if mifepristone is no longer available or is too hard to obtain. Misoprostol is somewhat less effective in ending pregnancies.
veryGood! (87612)
Related
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- Miller and Márquez joined by 5 first-time World Series umpires for Fall Classic
- María Corina Machado is winner of Venezuela opposition primary that the government has denounced
- Son of federal judge in Puerto Rico pleads guilty to killing wife after winning new trial
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- An Indianapolis police officer and a suspect shoot each other
- Outside voices call for ‘long overdue’ ‘good governance’ reform at Virginia General Assembly
- Billboard Music Awards 2023 Finalists: See the Complete List
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- What happened during the Maine shootings last night? A timeline of the tragedy
Ranking
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Will Ivanka Trump have to testify at her father’s civil fraud trial? Judge to hear arguments Friday
- NFL should have an open mind on expanding instant replay – but it won't
- Hailey Bieber calls pregnancy rumors 'disheartening'
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- Inflation is driving up gift prices. Here's how to avoid overspending this holiday.
- 5 Things podcast: Anti-science rhetoric heavily funded, well-organized. Can it be stopped?
- North Carolina Republicans put exclamation mark on pivotal annual session with redistricting maps
Recommendation
Could your smelly farts help science?
What happened during the Maine shootings last night? A timeline of the tragedy
What happened to the internet without net neutrality?
A salty problem for people near the mouth of the Mississippi is a wakeup call for New Orleans
Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
China shows off a Tibetan boarding school that’s part of a system some see as forced assimilation
Report: Quran-burning protester is ordered to leave Sweden but deportation on hold for now
Best Buy recalls almost 1 million pressure cookers after spewed contents burn 17 people